find a location for property in a new city
Showing posts with label ASP.NET MVC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ASP.NET MVC. Show all posts

Saturday, 27 October 2012

Unexpected "string" keyword after "@" character. Once inside code, you do not need to prefix constructs like "string" with "@"

After upgrading an ASP.NET MVC 3 project to MVC 4 I noticed a change in the Razor parser that threw a Parser Error saying: 'Unexpected "string" keyword after "@" character. Once inside code, you do not need to prefix constructs like "string" with "@"'

Firstly this has always working when it was MVC 3 and Razor v1. I may have been getting the syntax wrong all along but if the syntax allowed it was it really wrong?

What I was doing was trying to put some server code in a Razor helper with no surrounding HTML tags, like this example:

@helper Currency1000s(int? value)
{
    if(value == null)
    {
        -
    }
    else
    {
        @string.Format("{0:C0}k", value / 1000.0)
    }
}

Interestingly if I were to replace line 9 with @value all would be fine. Anyway, it is an easy enough fix, you just need to wrap the string.Format in HTML tags or the text tags as I did here:

@helper Currency1000s(int? value)
{
    if(value == null)
    {
        -
    }
    else
    {
        @string.Format("{0:C0}k", value / 1000.0)
    }
}

Follow britishdev on Twitter

Tuesday, 29 November 2011

Conflicting versions of ASP.NET Web Pages detected

I was going through the Windows Azure Platform Training Kit, Exercise 1 of the Service Bus Messaging lab and I ran into the following error message when trying to run my site, "Conflicting versions of ASP.NET Web Pages detected: specified version is "1.0.0.0", but the version in bin is "2.0.0.0". To continue, remove files from the application's bin directory or remove the version specification in web.config."

I checked the web.config and the assembly specified was indeed 1.0.0.0: <add assembly="System.Web.WebPages, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" />.

When I checked the System.Web.WebPages reference in my project though it also said its version is 1.0.0.0. So what's the problem?

System.Web.WebPages.Deployment

The assembly System.Web.WebPages.Deployment was referenced in my project and on closer inspection it was version 2.0.0.0 so it must be this which is causing the problem. I do not need this assembly though so I deleted it and the error went away.

Follow britishdev on Twitter

Saturday, 13 August 2011

ASP.NET MVC Checkbox has a hidden input too

I noticed strange behaviour whilst coding and ASP.NET MVC CheckBox Html Helper. I noticed that the field which was in part of a GET form was creating the query string with the same field in it twice. When the box was checked one parameter was true and the other was false.

Say I have a boolean field, MyField, that I am creating a checkbox for. I would write this: @Html.CheckBox("MyField"). You would expect this to output a single check box but if you actually look at the HTML that is generated you will notice that is also creates a hidden field.



I found out the the reason for this is written within the ASP.NET MVC source code:
if (inputType == InputType.CheckBox) {
    // Render an additional  for checkboxes. This
    // addresses scenarios where unchecked checkboxes are not sent in the request.
    // Sending a hidden input makes it possible to know that the checkbox was present
    // on the page when the request was submitted.
    StringBuilder inputItemBuilder = new StringBuilder();
    inputItemBuilder.Append(tagBuilder.ToString(TagRenderMode.SelfClosing));

    TagBuilder hiddenInput = new TagBuilder("input");
    hiddenInput.MergeAttribute("type", HtmlHelper.GetInputTypeString(InputType.Hidden));
    hiddenInput.MergeAttribute("name", name);
    hiddenInput.MergeAttribute("value", "false");
    inputItemBuilder.Append(hiddenInput.ToString(TagRenderMode.SelfClosing));
    return inputItemBuilder.ToString();
}

I appreciate the reasoning behind this but in my scenario MyField is part of a ViewModel that is being sent with the form and of course boolean values are False by default so this is wasted on my scenario.

Another reason I do not like this is because I am using the GET method on my form the user will see this oddity in the querystring. Worse still, they be a developer and judge my code as rubbish not knowing it is the doing of ASP.NET MVC. I can't have that! ;)

Solution

Simple solution really. Write the HTML you want in HTML, forget about the HtmlHelper:
<input type="checkbox" name="MyField" value="true" id="MyField"
@Html.Raw((Model.MyField) ? "checked=\"checked\"" : "") />

Remember the value="true" because the default value to be sent is "on" if it is checked, which obviously can't be parsed to a Boolean.

Obviously, this doesn't look that clean but I will continue to do this on forms that use the GET method.

Follow britishdev on Twitter

Wednesday, 6 July 2011

Custom Model Binder for binding drop downs into a DateTime in MVC

I have a Nullable DateTime Property in my Model I want to bind painlessly with three drop down select boxes I have for Day Month and Year respectively.

First thing to do is to make a new shiny custom model binder. I have done mine by inheriting from DefaultModelBinder (which you will need to include System.Web.Mvc to access).
using System;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Web.Mvc;

namespace Infrastructure.OFP.ModelBinders
{
    public class MyUserModelBinder : DefaultModelBinder
    {
        protected override void BindProperty(ControllerContext controllerContext,
            ModelBindingContext bindingContext, PropertyDescriptor propertyDescriptor)
        {
            if (propertyDescriptor.PropertyType == typeof(DateTime?)
                && propertyDescriptor.Name == "DateOfBirth")
            {
                var request = controllerContext.HttpContext.Request;
                var prefix = propertyDescriptor.Name;
    
//remember I am a Brit so this will give me dd/mm/yyyy format - this may not work for you :)
//also since this is a binder specific for one particular form the hardcoding of
//    MyUser.DateOfBirth is suitable
//AND... I am using Value because I am using a Nullable
                var date = string.Format("{0}/{1}/{2}",
                           request["MyUser.DateOfBirth.Value.Day"],
                           request["MyUser.DateOfBirth.Value.Month"],
                           request["MyUser.DateOfBirth.Value.Year"]);

                DateTime dateOfBirth;
                if (DateTime.TryParse(date, out dateOfBirth))
                {
                    SetProperty(controllerContext, bindingContext,
                                propertyDescriptor, dateOfBirth);
                    return;
                }
                else
                {
                    bindingContext.ModelState.AddModelError("DateOfBirth",
                           "Date was not recognised");
                    return;
                }
            }
            base.BindProperty(controllerContext, bindingContext, propertyDescriptor);
        }
    }
}

This new Model Binder will need to be registered to be used when binding a MyUser object. You do this in the Global.asax Application_Start() like so:
protected void Application_Start()
{
    ModelBinders.Binders[typeof(MyUser)] = new MyUserModelBinder();
    AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();
    RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
}

For reference the drop downs I created to populate the nullable DateTime property of DateOfBirth is as follows:
@Html.DropDownListFor(m => m.MyUser.DateOfBirth.Value.Day,
                      new SelectList(Model.Days, "Key", "Value"))
@Html.DropDownListFor(m => m.MyUser.DateOfBirth.Value.Month,
                      new SelectList(Model.Months, "Key", "Value"))
@Html.DropDownListFor(m => m.MyUser.DateOfBirth.Value.Year,
                      new SelectList(Model.Years, "Key", "Value"))
@Html.ValidationMessageFor(m => m.MyUser.DateOfBirth)

This works as I expected it to. It validates the property as expected using the DataAnnotations that I have defined for it.

Follow britishdev on Twitter

Tuesday, 14 June 2011

Two bugs in ASP.NET MVC 3 and a workaround for both

So I spent an hour today arsing about with a couple of ASP.NET MVC 3 bugs. One was a Routing issue that caused it to act differently to MVC 2. The second I found was a FormsAuthentication issue that insisting on sending me to /Account/Login.

Amazing how this crept in really given that it was community tested to death with such a massive ASP.NET MVC following so it is a wonder they weren't weeded out and fixed before RTM. Oh well, don't pretend you don't like a challenge.

Routing doesn't work the same in MVC3 from MVC2

Here is an example of this bug in action

My current route is:
routes.MapRoute("groups", "groups/{groupSlug}/{action}/{id}/{urlTitle}",
                new
                {
                    controller = "groups",
                    groupSlug = UrlParameter.Optional,
                    action = "index",
                    id = UrlParameter.Optional,
                    urlTitle = UrlParameter.Optional
                });

I am using this route in an ActionLink like this (well obviously I've changed it for clarity - but I was totally using T4MVC!):
<%: Html.ActionLink(item.Group.Title, "index", new { groupSlug = "something" })%>

In MVC2 it that produces the URL /groups/something. But in MVC3 it produces the URL /groups?groupSlug=something.

MVC3 Routing UrlParameter.Optional workaround

I struggled with this for a good few hours, many a time exclaiming that, "my route IS there! What the hell is wrong with you?!" I took it apart piece by piece to discover that MVC3 no longer likes multiple UrlParameter.Optional's in a row.

A rather ugly workaround for this is to put in a new route for each of these problem routes that have no reference to the following UrlParameter.Optional's. So AFTER the above route you I need to put in another route like this:
//workaround for MVC3 bug
routes.MapRoute("groupsFix", "groups/{groupSlug}/{action}",
                new
                {
                    controller = "groups",
                    groupSlug = UrlParameter.Optional,
                    action = "index"
                });

Since writing this I have discovered it is a known issue and Phil Haack has a much better explanation than me! Obviously.

FormsAuthentication.LoginUrl is always /Account/Login

I have setup my forms authentication in web.config to register the LoginUrl as "~/login" but since upgrading to MVC3 it has decided to ignore that and now FormsAuthentication.LoginUrl returns "~/Account/LogIn" regardless of what I set in web.config.

There is a workaround for this though. You simply need to add this line to your AppSettings:

and everything works how it used to. Strangeness indeed.

Conclusion

Live with it. Fix up your errors as explained above and continue staying up to speed with ASP.NET MVC. It's worth it if even just for Razor alone.

Follow britishdev on Twitter

Monday, 13 June 2011

Adding MVC dependencies to a project for deployment

Deployment of new web applications has been a bit annoying since the birth of ASP.NET MVC. Production servers with .NET 4 or 3.5 installed will still be missing key assemblies such as System.Web.Mvc.dll. This will cause errors such as "Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web.WebPages.Razor, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies" and "Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web.Mvc, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies." when your project is deployed to production.

It is confusing for two reasons: Why does it work on your development machine? Well, when you install all the tools required to make MVC application you get all the necessary assemblies with it. Which assemblies are your production servers missing? Well there were 3 in ASP.NET 1, 1 in ASP.NET MVC 2 but now with ASP.NET MVC 3 + Razor there are loads. I've found out which ones I actually need before but it is still confusing.

With Visual Studio 2010 SP1 there is a new feature that does all the hard work for you. You can right click your ASP.NET MVC web application project and select 'Add Deployable Dependencies...':

Then you select the type of features you are using so Visual Studio can decide which references are needed:


It will then create a _bin_deployableAssemblies directory for you with all the assemblies included:


Now if you publish using Web Deploy it will include those files as expected and your deployed solution will be happy once more.

Important note:
If you are not using the 'Web Deploy' as your publish method though - this will NOT work. You will need to reference the assemblies and make them bin deployable yourself.

Follow britishdev on Twitter

Friday, 6 May 2011

MVC3 deploy - Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web.WebPages.Razor, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies

Whilst deploying my newly upgraded ASP.NET MVC 3 web application to the production environment I started receiving a FileNotFoundException with the error message "Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web.WebPages.Razor, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified." I have encountered this before so I know it is about bin-deploying that assembly. But where is the System.Web.WebPages.Razor assembly?

Since you have installed ASP.NET MVC 3 on your development machine you have all these MVC 3 assemblies installed in your GAC. Your production machine does not!

So you need to find this file and make it bin deployable however this cheeky assembly isn't in you solution so how can you do that? Well... add it. Go to Add Reference on your root web project (e.g. Web.csproj) and find System.Web.WebPages.Razor and add.

Now right click this assembly in your references directory and click properties.

Now you can make it bin deployable by setting Copy Local to true like so:

Note this is how to deploy the System.Web.WebPages.Razor assembly withe your ASP.NET MVC 3 web application. To deploy a typical setup of an ASP.NET MVC 3 app you will need to do the same for all of the following assemblies:
  • System.Web.Mvc
  • System.Web.Helpers
  • System.Web.Razor
  • System.Web.WebPages
  • System.Web.WebPages.Deployment
  • System.Web.WebPages.Razor as detailed above
  • Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure this will also need a reference added as above
  • WebMatrix.Data this also needs the reference

Of course you only need to add the reference to these assemblies if they are not already there - in most cases it will be. This was mainly a blog post for the slightly more complicated System.Web.WebPages.Razor.dll

Update

There is an easier way to do this if you are using Visual Studio 2010 Service Pack 1 and using Web Deploy as your publish action when publishing. You can add deployable dependencies to your ASP.NET MVC project that will choose the necessary assemblies for you. Even easier!

Follow britishdev on Twitter

How to convert an ASP.NET Web Forms web application into ASP.NET MVC 3

So, you have a traditional web forms web application and you are inspired by the new ASP.NET MVC 3 are you? Well this is definitely doable. In this how to guide I will tell you step by step exactly how you can add your new ASP.NET MVC 3 work into your existing ASP.NET web forms project.

1. Add references

Right click on your web root project in Visual Studio (2010 in my case) and add the following references:
  • System.Web.Routing
  • System.Web.Abstractions
  • System.Web.Mvc
  • System.WebPages
  • System.Web.Helpers

2. Configuration

Make your web.config look like this. Obviously not exactly like this, don't just paste this over the top of your glorious web.config. I'm just highlighting the necessary points that need to be fitted into your existing web.config:
<appSettings>
  <add key="webpages:Version" value="1.0.0.0"/>
  <add key="ClientValidationEnabled" value="true"/>
  <add key="UnobtrusiveJavaScriptEnabled" value="true"/>
</appSettings>

<system.web>
  <compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.0">
    <assemblies>
      <add assembly="System.Web.Abstractions, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" />
      <add assembly="System.Web.Helpers, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" />
      <add assembly="System.Web.Routing, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" />
      <add assembly="System.Web.Mvc, Version=3.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" />
      <add assembly="System.Web.WebPages, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" />
    </assemblies>
  </compilation>
  <pages>
    <namespaces>
      <add namespace="System.Web.Helpers" />
      <add namespace="System.Web.Mvc" />
      <add namespace="System.Web.Mvc.Ajax" />
      <add namespace="System.Web.Mvc.Html" />
      <add namespace="System.Web.Routing" />
      <add namespace="System.Web.WebPages"/>
    </namespaces>
  </pages>
</system.web>
<system.webServer>
  <modules>
    <remove name="UrlRoutingModule-4.0" />
    <add name="UrlRoutingModule-4.0" type="System.Web.Routing.UrlRoutingModule" preCondition="" />
  </modules>
</system.webServer>
<runtime>
  <assemblyBinding xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1">
    <dependentAssembly>
      <assemblyIdentity name="System.Web.Mvc" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
      <bindingRedirect oldVersion="1.0.0.0-2.0.0.0" newVersion="3.0.0.0" />
    </dependentAssembly>
  </assemblyBinding>
</runtime>

Update: I have changed my recommendation against using <modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true"> in favour of adding the UrlRoutingModule-4.0 module with a blank precondition as I explain in my article Don't use runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true" for MVC routing.

However, if you disagree with me then you can make the modules section simply look like this:
<system.webServer>
  <modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true"/>
</system.webServer>

But be warned with that setting (or at least read the above blog post link to understand what you are doing)!

3. Routing

You will need to add a global.asax file to your web application if you haven't already got one. Right click > Add > Add New Item > Global Application Class:


Now in your global.asax add these usings:
using System.Web.Mvc;
using System.Web.Routing;

Now add these lines:
public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes)
{
    routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}");

    //ignore aspx pages (web forms take care of these)
    routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.aspx/{*pathInfo}");

    routes.MapRoute(
        // Route name
        "Default",
        // URL with parameters
        "{controller}/{action}/{id}",
        // Parameter defaults
        new { controller = "home", action = "index", id = "" }
        );
}

protected void Application_Start(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
}

4. Add some standard folders to the solution

Add a folder named 'Controllers' to your web project.
Add a folder named 'Views' to your web project.
Add a folder named 'Shared' to that Views folder.
Add a web configuration file to the Views folder (web.config).
Open this web.config in the Views folder and ensure make its contents as follows:
<?xml version="1.0"?>

<configuration>
  <configSections>
    <sectionGroup name="system.web.webPages.razor" type="System.Web.WebPages.Razor.Configuration.RazorWebSectionGroup, System.Web.WebPages.Razor, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35">
      <section name="host" type="System.Web.WebPages.Razor.Configuration.HostSection, System.Web.WebPages.Razor, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" requirePermission="false" />
      <section name="pages" type="System.Web.WebPages.Razor.Configuration.RazorPagesSection, System.Web.WebPages.Razor, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" requirePermission="false" />
    </sectionGroup>
  </configSections>

  <system.web.webPages.razor>
    <host factoryType="System.Web.Mvc.MvcWebRazorHostFactory, System.Web.Mvc, Version=3.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" />
    <pages pageBaseType="System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage">
      <namespaces>
        <add namespace="System.Web.Mvc" />
        <add namespace="System.Web.Mvc.Ajax" />
        <add namespace="System.Web.Mvc.Html" />
        <add namespace="System.Web.Routing" />
      </namespaces>
    </pages>
  </system.web.webPages.razor>

  <appSettings>
    <add key="webpages:Enabled" value="false" />
  </appSettings>

  <system.web>
    <httpHandlers>
      <add path="*" verb="*" type="System.Web.HttpNotFoundHandler"/>
    </httpHandlers>

    <!--
        Enabling request validation in view pages would cause validation to occur
        after the input has already been processed by the controller. By default
        MVC performs request validation before a controller processes the input.
        To change this behavior apply the ValidateInputAttribute to a
        controller or action.
    -->
    <pages
        validateRequest="false"
        pageParserFilterType="System.Web.Mvc.ViewTypeParserFilter, System.Web.Mvc, Version=3.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35"
        pageBaseType="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage, System.Web.Mvc, Version=3.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35"
        userControlBaseType="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl, System.Web.Mvc, Version=3.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35">
      <controls>
        <add assembly="System.Web.Mvc, Version=3.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" namespace="System.Web.Mvc" tagPrefix="mvc" />
      </controls>
    </pages>
  </system.web>

  <system.webServer>
    <validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false" />

    <handlers>
      <remove name="BlockViewHandler"/>
      <add name="BlockViewHandler" path="*" verb="*" preCondition="integratedMode" type="System.Web.HttpNotFoundHandler" />
    </handlers>
  </system.webServer>
</configuration>


5. Get Visual Studio 2010 to recognise your MVC skills

If you right click the Controllers folder and select Add, you'll notice there is no Controller class to add. You need to make a change to your web project file.

Using Windows Explorer find the web project file (Web.csproj in my case) and open it in a text editor. You will need to add "{E53F8FEA-EAE0-44A6-8774-FFD645390401};" to the ProjectTypeGuids element.

E.g. mine now looks like this:
<ProjectTypeGuids>{E53F8FEA-EAE0-44A6-8774-FFD645390401};{349c5851-65df-11da-9384-00065b846f21};{fae04ec0-301f-11d3-bf4b-00c04f79efbc}</ProjectTypeGuids>

6. Optional: Add a Controller (for a laugh)

Back to Visual Studio 2010 and right click the Controllers folder > Add > Controller... call it HomeController.

using System.Web.Mvc;

namespace Web.Controllers
{
    public class HomeController : Controller
    {
        public ActionResult Index()
        {
            ViewBag.Message = "This is MVC";
            return View();
        }
    }
}

7. Optional: Add a View (just to show off)

Right click where it says return View(); and select Add View... then click Add.

<%@ Page Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<dynamic>" %>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" >
<head runat="server">
    <title>Index</title>
</head>
<body>
    <div>
        <%: ViewBag.Message %>
    </div>
</body>
</html>

8. Optional: Try it (just to self-indulge your skills)

Now run you site and go to http://{localhost}/home

I hope this saved you the hours it took me! Please comment if you have any feedback. It would be much appreciated

More reading here if you would like to use an existing WebForms MasterPage in your new MVC project.

Follow britishdev on Twitter

Friday, 18 March 2011

Firefox loses Request headers after redirect

Firefox does not remember some request headers after a redirect. This can cause problems with AJAX requests that use the X-Requested-With: XmlHttpRequest header.

I noticed a little problem with Firefox. In my scenario I have added the SEO optimising IIS Url Rewriting module pattern that redirects URL with upper case in to a lower case version.

For all browsers the AJAX request comes in with the X-Requested-With: XmlHttpRequest request header, a 301 status code is returned with the lower cased location, that new location then is requested with the X-Requested-With: XmlHttpRequest header in tact.

Firefox, however, does not honour this header in its redirect. This causes problems with my ASP.NET MVC code that checks for the request being via AJAX using IsAjaxRequest(). This method checks if X-Requested-With: XmlHttpRequest is in the headers (or in other exciting places).

Work around

I was going to try and do something clever like detect the browser and this header and then not redirect under some circumstances because (brace yourself SEO consultants) functionality is more important than SEO. I decided to instead make sure that one troublesome link was lowercase and so avoided the redirect.

Just hope this answers your questions if you come across this oddity in Firefox.

Follow britishdev on Twitter

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

Regex [x-y] range in reverse order

I started receiving a 'System.ArgumentException' error with a decription of 'parsing "[A-Za-z0-9_- %]+\.(bmp|jpg|jpeg|gif|png)" - [x-y] range in reverse order' after I wrote a C# Regex in my ASP.NET MVC web application.

I was using a RegularExpression Validator in my ASP.NET MVC app but it wasn't having any of it. I was looking at "A-Z" etc thinking IT IS THE RIGHT ORDER!

Turns out it is because I have a hyphen in another part of my regex expression. The one after the underscore.

Solution

Turns out hyphens have to appear at either the front or the end of the regular expression - or be escaped with a \. So now I have updated my regular expression from
[RegularExpression(@"[A-Za-z0-9_- %]+\.(bmp|jpg|jpeg|gif|png)")]
to
[RegularExpression(@"[A-Za-z0-9_ %-]+\.(bmp|jpg|jpeg|gif|png)")]

Follow britishdev on Twitter

Thursday, 23 December 2010

3 things that changed ASP.NET development in 2010

As 2010 draws to a close I thought about how I was writing code last year. I realised how much development has changed in just one year. I want to look at how my work has evolved during 2010.

Entity Framework 4

I really like using Entity Framework. I wasn't quite sure about it in its first version, however, since the release of Entity Framework 4 in April I fully adopted it. It solves so many problems that I feel exist in modern web development.

I like stored procedures, I know a lot about using and optimising them but there is something seriously wrong with their concept - you have business logic in your database! When you think open mindedly about what a logical architecture should be you realise just how ridiculous that is. Entity Framework takes the last remaining strand of business logic back to the web developer.

Aside from the improvement in architecture, the other benefits I love about it is that speed you can develop with, deferred querying that improves reuse of queries, strong typing of Linq to Entities, Intellisense when writing queries, no more mapping, no more writing tedious POCOs, lack of tedious code in general.

Its hard to believe only a year ago I was writing stored procedures.

ASP.NET MVC 2

Again, I had a look into this when it was in its first version but was carried by the hype around v2. I fully adopted the use of MVC in April too and what a joy it has been to use.
A lot has changed over the last 10 years of web development such as increasing expectations of performance and web standards, popularity of unit tests and agile development, ubiquity of AJAX.

Now, I wouldn't go so far as to say there is anything wrong with ASP.NET Webforms I just feel that ASP.NET MVC has been a superb reaction to these changing trends in what web developers want to produce.

Whilst all of the above concerns can be answered by Webforms, like turning off view state to remove bloat, moving logic out of code behind to unit test, improved web standards in ASP.NET 4 etc you still feel as though you are swimming up stream some what.

I much prefer to get down and dirty with ASP.NET MVC. It's refreshing to get involved in HTML and HTTP again in a way that was abstracted out of your hands with web forms. It makes you feel like a real developer again, omnipotent! Of course the framework and templates do a lot of the tedious work for you but let's keep that quiet ay... Omnipotent! Remember that, yeah.

It's hard to think only a year ago I was using web forms.

Contribution

This has obviously been around for some time but I think only during 2010 has Microsoft's commitment to open source and code contribution has really shone through. It had been displayed, proven and truly adopted by the community. Look at how much there is to gain from MVC contrib.

I would like to think this is why frameworks such as Entity Framework and ASP.NET MVC are evolving so quickly and more importantly in the right direction. Microsoft is really listening to the community now. Forums and polls about what you would like to see in the next version of Entity Framework for example.

It is not just direct listening either, I'd be extremely surprised if Microsoft weren't reading blogs, browsing stackoverflow and stalking twitter to gain insight into what the community love and what they are crying out for.

It's hard to think last year I didn't have a blog or a twitter account or contribute on stackoverflow or publish any code.

Follow britishdev on Twitter

Thursday, 23 September 2010

Get all month names from DateTime in C# programatically

I needed to have a drop down list of all the months but I don't want to be writing all of that out. So is there a way to list all the months programmatically in C#. Hell yeah there is

I knew there would be a way to do it and I knew it would be something to do with the CultureInfo of the session.

Here is a method I wrote to return a set of key values for each month:
public IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<int, string>> GetAllMonths()
{
 for (int i = 1; i <= 12; i++)
 {
  yield return new KeyValuePair<int, string>(i, DateTimeFormatInfo.CurrentInfo.GetMonthName(i));
 }
}

Just to demonstrate, I used it in my ASP.NET MVC app:
<%: Html.DropDownListFor(model => model.DobMonth, new SelectList(Model.GetAllMonths(), "Key", "Value", Model.DobMonth)) %>

Which outputs the following HTML:
<select id="DobMonth" name="DobMonth">
<option selected="selected" value="1">January</option> 
<option value="2">February</option> 
<option value="3">March</option> 
<option value="4">April</option> 
<option value="5">May</option> 
<option value="6">June</option> 
<option value="7">July</option> 
<option value="8">August</option> 
<option value="9">September</option> 
<option value="10">October</option> 
<option value="11">November</option> 
<option value="12">December</option> 
</select>

Follow britishdev on Twitter